I don't have the hardware test this, but it is almost certainly a typo in the code dating back to at least 2004. Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int pl01x_generic_setbrg(struct pl01x_regs *regs, enum pl01x_type type,
divisor = UART_PL010_BAUD_9600;
break;
case 19200:
- divisor = UART_PL010_BAUD_9600;
+ divisor = UART_PL010_BAUD_19200;
case 38400:
divisor = UART_PL010_BAUD_38400;